Based on the information in the passage, of which of the following would the author NOT approve?
Explanation:
An application question. Quickly review the author's main ideas: Individual opinions are good unless harmful to others, and individuals should be allowed to experiment with them even if they're personally hurt by them. Scan down the answer choices for something that would run counter to these principles. (C) is an example of stifling an individual's right to personal judgment, which the author would certainly frown upon.
Wrong answers:
Option (a): Opposite. If the teasing is causing the classmate harm, there's good reason to believe that the author would approve of the scolding. Option (b): Out of Scope. There's nothing in the passage that would be impacted by this situation. Option (d): Opposite. The author would surely approve of a published opinion designed to prevent rather than to cause harm.
Hence, option (c).
» Your doubt will be displayed only after approval.
Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.