Question: Mr. Opportunist, a veteran member of NPP, stakes his claims to be nominated as an NPP candidate in the upcoming election. Mr. Opportunist presented the following arguments in favour of his candidature to the NPP Executive Committee.
Mr. Loyal’s candidature in the upcoming election will adversely impact NPP’s chances. Hence, the party should not nominate him.
The party should call a press conference to disown Mr. Loyal. This would enhance the party’s image.
The party would not be able to take any strong disciplinary action against Mr. Loyal, if he gets re-elected.
I have a lot of goodwill and significant followers in the constituency,
None of my close relatives are into active politics.
Which of the following combinations would best strengthen the claim of Mr. Opportunist?
Argument I rules out the party's intention of nominating Mr. Loyal in the upcoming election making way for Mr. Opportunist. Hence, it makes for a strong argument supporting the claim of Mr. Opportunist. Hence, eliminate options 3, 4 and 5.