Please submit your concern

Explanation:

Option 1 can be affirmed from the “5.30 pm” extract of the passage.
The second sentence of the passage, “How he relished his power over the classes that had kept his family pinned under their heels for centuries – like the stenographer who was a brahmin” provides sufficient information to infer that the judge was not a brahmin.
The lines from the “2.00 pm” extract of the passage, “...although his own command of Hindi and Urdu was tenuous...” state explicitly that the judge did not have a proper understanding of these languages.
The key lies in the meaning of the word “tenuous”, which means 'lacking a sound basis, unsubstantiated'.
Through the last sentence of the “8.30 am” extract of the passage, “...nobody knew that Jemubhai (the judge) himself was noosed...” it can be inferred that he owed money.
Hence, the correct answer is option 3.

Feedback

Help us build a Free and Comprehensive Preparation portal for various competitive exams by providing us your valuable feedback about Apti4All and how it can be improved.


© 2024 | All Rights Reserved | Apti4All